Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective
نویسندگان
چکیده
Some of the most fruitful insights generated by social science in recent decades flow from explorations of how institutions, under stood as sets of regularized practices with a rule-like quality, struc ture the behavior of political and economic actors. I It is not surpris ing that attention has now turned to the second-order problem of explaining when and how institutions change. 2 In conceptual terms, however, this task is intrinsically difficult. By their nature, analy ses designed to explain why institutions have a persistent impact on behavior tend to overstate the solidity of institutions. Acknowledging their plasticity raises questions about when institutions should be seen as determinants of behavior and when as objects of strategic action themselves) This problem afflicts rational-choice approaches to institutions with particular intensity because of the elegant solutions such analyses have devised to explain the force and persistence of institutions. Typically, they see institutions as patterns of regularized behavior that reflect Pareto-optimal equilibria or subgame perfect solutions to collective
منابع مشابه
CHAPTER 2 Institutional Theory
Although most political sociologists and political scientists nowadays either consider themselves or are deemed “institutionalists,” key differences remain among major schools of institutionalism (see reviews in Pierson and Skocpol 2002; Amenta 2005). In this chapter, we review sociological institutionalism, historical institutionalism, and political institutionalism. We discuss their similarit...
متن کاملPolitical Science and the Three New Institutionalisms*
The ‘new institutionalism’ is a term that now appears with growing frequency in political science. However, there is considerable confusion about just what the ‘new institutionalism’ is, how it differs from other approaches, and what sort of promise or problems it displays. The object of this essay is to provide some preliminary answers to these questions by reviewing recent work in a burgeonin...
متن کاملTaking Evolution Seriously: Historical Institutionalism and Evolutionary Theory
Social science in general and political science in particular have been resistant to the mobilization of evolutionary and specifically Darwinian ideas for analytic and explanatory purposes. This paper documents a disconnect between political scientists and standard evolutionary theory. Historical institutionalism is identified as a subfield particularly well-suited, but presently ill-equipped, ...
متن کاملReflections on the Impact of the New Economic, Sociological and Historical Institutionalism in Institutional Social Policy
This paper intends to make a reflection and analysis of the impact of theoretical and methodological frameworks of reference on different neo-institutional approaches in social policy. The paper questions the functionality and continuity of the institutions that are responsible for the functions of designing and implementing programs of social policy, given the profound changes on the environme...
متن کاملDeveloping the Conceptual and Methodological Framework for Discursive-institutional Analysis of Coastal Exclusive Space Production: with Special Reference to Critical Realism Perspective
Because of the limited capacity of coastal lands and conflicting interests among stakeholders for coastal resources, there are intensifying pressures to retain and provide more public access to the coast. Coastal gated communities have been developed increasingly in the middle shoreline of Caspian Sea in North of Iran. They are kind of exclusive space production as they restrict public access t...
متن کامل